CDC LIED about not having 2019-nCoV Isolates!
The PCR Test data would not be admissible in court, Dr. Mullis is rolling in his grave!
WHAT THE PCR TEST DID
The 7 studies cited on CDC’s website were intended to convince the public that the universal mask-wearing policy was a good one. These studies showed that both asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals were testing positive for COVID-19. Therefore, the assumption was made that the disease could spread efficiently through asymptomatic individuals. This assumption enabled CDC to prescribe universal masking with the stated intent being the reduction of exposure.
PCR TEST QUALITY CONCERNS
Because PCR test results were driving policy making, we began investigating. The EUA for the PCR test was approved by the FDA for use. Within the “performance characteristics” paragraph of the EUA, it claimed that no 2019-nCoV isolates were available to properly calibrate the test.
Upon investigation within CDC’s own library, we learned that CDC’s claim of not having 2019-nCoV isolates was a lie!
The same day the FDA approved CDC’s PCR test EUA that did not use 2019-nCoV isolates, CDC sent 2019-nCoV isolates to the international lab!
WHY DOES THIS MATTER?
Having no isolates for the PCR test meant quality control concerns for the findings that were discovered by using this method for data. The FDA’s “SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data” paper admits that it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.
Meaning, the PCR tests used had no quality control and their data is not reliable! The world was ruined by a test method that is not even court worthy! Dr. Kary Mullis warned us of this test’s limitations and is rolling in his grave that his invention has been used in this fraudulent manner.